Why is SVN better than VSS? [closed]

Posted by tsilb on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by tsilb
Published on 2010-04-15T21:54:42Z Indexed on 2010/04/15 22:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 348

Filed under:
|
|

I've heard soooo many people complain about VSS, and noooo people complaining about SVN. We use SVN on my work project. It's slow, regularly freezes up my IDE, and has wonky behavior like looking for a database server every time I right-click the Solution node in my Solution Explorer.

When I used VSS, everything worked beautifully, except for access restrictions which I of course blame on the people who control access. VSS is built by Microsoft and thus has great integration with Visual Studio. SVN is written by pretty much anybody with some free time (right?) and thus kinda works most of the time... And I honestly get the impression they had a dozen different directions in the design instead of one.

So why do I keep hearing that SVN is better than VSS?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about source-control

Related posts about vss